1.States of Health (Indian Express)

2.Permaculture: a shield against GM crops (Down to Earth)

 

1.States of Health (Live Mint)

Synoptic line: It throws light on the Global Burden of disease study and related developments. (GS paper I)

Overview

  • Recently released data from Global Burden of Disease study will help states chart their individual trajectories. They need to strengthen disease monitoring systems

Global Burden of Disease report

  • Health status of populations across the world changes over time in response to socio-economic, demographic, nutritional, scientific, technological, environmental and cultural shifts. Such health transitions have been especially profound in the past half-century due to sweeping industrialisation, rapid urbanisation and relentless globalisation in most parts of the world.
  • It is necessary to understand, and even predict, the patterns and dynamics of health transition so that multi-sectoral actions can be taken to protect and promote the health of populations.
  • The Global Burden of Disease study was initiated 26 years ago to chart the changing patterns of disease-related death and disability from 1990 onwards. Since then, estimates are periodically provided for years of life lost to premature mortality as well as for years of disease-related disability that is weighted for severity.
  • A combined measure of these two metrics is expressed as the loss of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) attributable to any disease or risk factor. In recent years, national and sub-national estimates are emerging to provide greater focus to action within countries.

Indian efforts

  • The first-of-its-kind Indian effort to map state-level disease burdens was undertaken by over 1,000 experts, in partnership with the Indian Council of Medical Research and the team that leads the global study. The results, reported last week, highlight significant trends common to all states as well as important differences between them.

Key findings

  • Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. However, life expectancy of women in Uttar Pradesh is 12 years lower than that of women in Kerala, while the life expectancy of men in Assam is 10 years lower than that of men in Kerala.
  • The per person disease burden, from all causes, dropped by 36 per cent in the same period. However, there was an almost two-fold difference between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.
  • The under-five mortality rate has reduced substantially in all states in these 25 years. But there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest, in Assam and Uttar Pradesh, as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016. Despite a decline from 1990 levels, child and maternal malnutrition remains the single largest risk factor, contributing to 15 per cent of the disease burden in 2016. With its under-five mortality six times higher than Sri Lanka and burden of child and maternal malnutrition 12 times higher than in China, India has wide gaps to bridge.
  • Communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases contributed to 61 per cent of India’s disease burden in 1990. This dropped to 33 per cent in 2016. But the share of non-communicable diseases in the disease burden increased from 30 per cent in 1990 to 55 per cent in 2016, and that of injuries increased from 9 per cent to 12 per cent.
  • While all states show this trend, Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this ratio is much lower in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
  • Five of the 10 individual leading causes of the disease burden in India in 2016 are a carry-over of past threats: Diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, neonatal pre-term birth, and tuberculosis. Though the disease burden due to poor water and sanitation decreased in these 25 years, the per capita burden due to these factors is 40 times that in China.
  • In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease being the top two causes and stroke the fifth leading cause.
  • A group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke and diabetes, caused about 25 per cent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, up from about 10 per cent in 1990. Ambient air pollution and household air pollution both rank high as risk factors in 2016, the former rising and the latter declining in the past 25 years.
  • There were large variations between states in the degree to which these risks are rising. States in early stages of the health transition were coping with both the persisting challenge of infectious, nutritional and pregnancy-related health threats and the rising magnitude of non-communicable diseases. States in the advanced stage of the transition were grappling largely with non-communicable disorders.

Way ahead

  • These data, of time trends and inter- state variations, highlight the need to develop specific strategies to address the major contributors to disease burden within each state. Disaggregated data, as provided in the recent report, will help to tailor customised state-level responses while summated time trends will help the National Health Policy to set and track the progress towards country-level targets.
  • Since the present report provides modelled estimates derived from multiple and often limited data sets, it is imperative to strengthen vital registration mechanisms and beef up disease and risk factor surveillance systems in every state.
  • The broad national agenda should be elimination of malnutrition, reduction of child and maternal mortality, control of infectious diseases and containment of risk factors contributing to non-communicable diseases. This report provides each state the GPS to chart their individual journeys towards those goals, from different starting points.

Question– What are the findings associated with Global burden of disease report? What it reflects about the state of health in India?

2.Permaculture: a shield against GM crops (Down to Earth)

Synoptic line: It throws light on the importance of permaculture in sustainable agriculture. (GS paper III)

Overview

  • Recently, the 13th Permaculture Convergence began on a highly symbolic note. The conference started with sowing of seeds and inauguration of seed box, which consisted of traditional variety of seeds. Permaculture practitioners and enthusiasts from over 63 countries have assembled at the conference.
  • Besides the sessions by various speakers, there were exhibitions on eco-friendly products and also sessions on farmers’ stories, where they narrated their success stories.

What is permaculture

  • Permaculture, originally ‘Permanent Agriculture’, is often viewed as a set of gardening techniques, but it has in fact developed into a whole design philosophy, and for some people a philosophy for life. Its central theme is the creation of human systems which provide for human needs, but using many natural elements and drawing inspiration from natural ecosystems. Its goals and priorities coincide with what many people see as the core requirements for sustainability.

What are GM crops

  • Genetically modified are plants used in agriculture, the DNA of which has been modified using genetic engineering methods. In most cases, the aim is to introduce a new trait to the plant which does not occur naturally in the species. Examples in food crops include resistance to certain pests, diseases, or environmental conditions, reduction of spoilage, or resistance to chemical treatments (e.g. resistance to a herbicide), or improving the nutrient profile of the crop.

How GM crops are harmful

  • Agencies such as The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) urges doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for all patients. They cite animal studies showing organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders, accelerated aging, and infertility. Human studies show how genetically modified (GM) food can leave material behind inside us, possibly causing long-term problems. Genes inserted into GM soy, for example, can transfer into the DNA of bacteria living inside us, and that the toxic insecticide produced by GM corn was found in the blood of pregnant women and their unborn foetuses.
  • GMOs contaminate: GMOs cross pollinate and their seeds can travel. It is impossible to fully clean up our contaminated gene pool. Self-propagating GMO pollution will outlast the effects of global warming and nuclear waste. The potential impact is huge, threatening the health of future generations. GMO contamination has also caused economic losses for organic and non-GMO farmers who often struggle to keep their crops pure.
  • GMOs increase herbicide use: Most GM crops are engineered to be “herbicide tolerant”―they deadly weed killer. Monsanto, for example, sells Roundup Ready crops, designed to survive applications of their Roundup herbicide. Between 1996 and 2008, US farmers sprayed an extra 383 million pounds of herbicide on GMOs. Overuse of Roundup results in “superweeds,” resistant to the herbicide. This is causing farmers to use even more toxic herbicides every year.
  • Genetic engineering creates dangerous side effects: By mixing genes from totally unrelated species, genetic engineering unleashes a host of unpredictable side effects. Moreover, irrespective of the type of genes that are inserted, the very process of creating a GM plant can result in massive collateral damage that produces new toxins, allergens, carcinogens, and nutritional deficiencies.

How permaculture can assist

  • This has led to increasing cases of farmer suicides and crop failure. But practising permaculture, on the other hand, ensures fair trade for the farmers, as the input cost is less and it does not have the concept of loans and debts. As the farmers save the seeds and use it for next cropping season, the cases of capitalisation of seed, branding and patenting will reduce and famers will have their own stocks. 

How soil health card is making matters worse

  • The card, provided by the government only gives information on soil fertility and not soil health. He says that the card only shows the quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium present in the soil. Based on this data, the government prescribes quantities of fertilisers to be used.
  • In this process, we forget the vital role played by the organisms. Moreover, due to overdose of fertilisers, these microorganisms are destroyed and, in return, the soil health gets affected. Thus, the Soil Health Card is misleading the farmers. He says the in permaculture, the soil is seen as a holistic system and only that will replenish and maintain the soil and not the soil card.

Way ahead

  • Most of the communication in farming is top down, and the communication among farmers is missing now. It is important to create a platform for farmers to interact with other farmers. Scientists should also learn from the farmers by working in the field and not in the lab.
  • For a farmer to have a fair trade, market needs and consumption pattern has to change. People want to eat only few crops, but more awareness needs to be spread about the indigenous crops and farmers should be encouraged to do multi-cropping, instead of mono-cropping.

Question– What are the important developments regarding permaculture that should take place in order to practice sustainable agriculture.